Lindell's cyber expert admits claims aren't legit

Is your headline purposely misleading? Why did you change the essence of the Times headline to yours?

“Can’t prove” does not equal “admits claims aren’t legit.”

You guys do a lot of finger pointing on exact language but are guilty of your own charge.

You’ve done it multiple times tonight.

1 Like

Thank you for the reminder that you haven’t now, nor have ever had, a shred of integrity.

“So our team said, we’re not going to say that this is legitimate if we don’t have confidence in the information,” Mr. Merritt said on Wednesday, the second day of the symposium."

You dumb ass!

“We’re not going to say this is legitimate”

Is not “this is illegitimate”

You fucking moron.

He is saying that, in his opinion, provided the information he has, he can’t say the claim is legitimate.

That doesn’t make it illegitimate.

Now go fuck off you idiot.

Hey 51 or UMfire.

Pin this for posterity. The crybaby is leaving again and I want him to see this as the first post if he ever decides to return.

A complete asshole this guy is. Not even a Miami fan. Or a fan of one of our rivals… Think about what a loser he has to be to want to come here and reveal himself for the fool that he is.

To be fair, the 2nd half of the quote, which you skipped, says “we don’t have confidence in the information.”

You make a good distinction in Warden’s take on the headline, but he’s not far off, or at least that’s his conclusion from what was said. You’re free to disagree, but it’s not a good look for the Symposium either way.

I have yet to see anything from anyone that makes me think the election was hacked. Nothing! I’m not saying it isn’t possible to hack machines or networks. I’m just not seeing it with proof of how they did it let alone how they did it in multiple districts across the country with different set-ups, security teams/protocols/devices, all within hours of each other, with not a single trace AND not a single human leaking how smart they were with being able to hack the US election. LOL

We have hackers pulling off nearly $1B jobs and spilling the beans… that is what they do… yet hack an election and ZERO NOTHING NADA. No proof of payments. No vocal parties. No data showing it happened…

As of today:
Is it possible? yes. Did it happen? No

You’re never allowed to hold someone accountable for being technically accurate about something again. You’ve forfeited that card for all time with this lame ass attempt to save Warden from his misreading of the quote.

Yes I am. I agreed with you, for the record, but you’re too dumb to notice that. I merely said his conclusion wasn’t much of a reach based on what was actually said.

Lol you agreed with me until you disagreed. It invalidated your agreement. :joy::joy::joy:

Dude, he was joking with you.

He never gets me 90. He never sees my playful side.

He wasn’t joking, 90s. GSC absolutely hates the fact that I hold him accountable for the things he says, and this was a poor attempt to turn the tables.

Well I laughed at it because he was being facetious.

ACCOUNTABLE?

JUNIOR HOLDING SOMEONE ACCOUNTABLE?

FREAKEN HILARIOUS FROM THE GUY THAT THINKS WE CAN’T ADD COVID DEATHS TO THE OVERALL TOTAL DEATHS FOR THE YEAR…

Who’s this “we” you’re talking about? You’re the one that omitted covid deaths, not me. those death numbers are yours…

WHY CAN’T YOU POST THE REAL NUMBERS IF STORM’S ARE WRONG?

HOW DO YOU KNOW STORM’S ARE WRONG?

THAT LET SHIT YOU KEEP POSTING IS NOWHERE ON WHAT STORM POSTED…

WHY CAN’T YOU POST THE REAL NUMBERS AND SOURCE THEM?

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/

WHERE ARE THE NUMBERS QUALIFIED?

WHERE ARE THE REAL NUMBERS YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT?

WHERE ARE THE DEATH NUMBERS ON THAT PAGE?