Fine, I assume?
I’m not sure why you feel you’re in an argument. This is a thread about China, and I posted about China. Unless you mean to defend China, I’m not sure what skin you have in this?
Guy is now gonna act like he didn’t call people on this board out in his original post.
Listen- China is a communist county that brutalizes its own people. Who knows why they are actually doing this.
The reality is, however, that the lockdowns didn’t work, the vaccines didn’t work, and you know it.
Such a fucking lying fraud
Not true at all.
Depends on the threat level
Lockdowns had no effect buddy. Vaccines had an effect, a negative one.
Cardiologists and oncologists are now starting to go against advising the vaccine due to adverse effects. Just admit you morons were wrong.
You assholes put people at greater risk. Didn’t save a single fucking life. Evil.
I’ll let you pick your own article from the 1000s that refute your tabloid biased trash
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C11&q=efficacy+COVID-19+vaccine&btnG=
Depends on what context you’re inquiring about
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/swedish-economy-set-grind-halt-inflation-bites-2022-09-28/
Not to mention they have an equivalent population size to North Carolina.
This guy thinks that linear regression models can tell us if lockdowns worked lol. Academia is a funny place. Look to the R squared for the meaning of life!
I love when Warden starts his posts this way. It means his exhaustive google search produced more results against his position than for so he has to highly qualify his response in order to thread the needle.
Everything relies on or is affected by context warden.
If you look at Sweden they are a model case. The only downside you can push is that some older people died.
Considering all things that’s the best case outcome. The young and most productive and potentially active in society received the greatest benefit. The already sick and weak succumbed to the disease.
In every other natural process on earth we think this is absolutely a good productive model. But not with the COVID junkies. WE MUST SAVE EVERYONE EVEN IF IT MEANS PUTTING ADDITIONAL RISKS ON OTHER GROUPS!!!
COVID nazis.
Or, you were vague.
Um…
Again…quite a revealing post. The GOPers who talked about things like death panels with Obamacare and rationing medical treatment, in the end, see people as only numbers without any value for their lives in general. You literally said it is okay old people died because they don’t produce as much value to the state.
Seriously…
Again…
Says the guy who said it was good that old people died because they are less valuable to the state than young people.
Can’t get more projection than this one, folks. Clear as day as to who you are dealing with and their lack of morality and basic values. You’ve got some serious demons inside you, pal.
This is as about uneducated as it gets
Can’t fix stupid.
1 Like
Anyone who mentioned China mentioned it very, very, very early(like March-June 2020)…And every other person I know was saying that. “Well in china you weren’t allowed to leave your house”
I never used it as a “China is already done thing” so I hope you aren’t talking about me. That wouldn’t even make sense with anything I’ve ever said
If anything this speaks to not allowing natural immunity to do it’s thing.
The point is…People are going to die. Let’s let immunity do it’s thing. Get a vax if you think you need (although with a lot of vax stuff coming out, you better be weighing risk vs. reward)
Guy t would have been fine with 75% of the population wiped out.
@thre305ive @Warden84 …Again this is your man here guys. Please speak to this idiot. How are there people who still believe shit like this? And yes he probably is exaggerating 75%…But the fact he thinks there would have been some type of “wipeout” at all. This is one delusional, fear-mongering, self-important fucking idiotic breed of person here.
I absolutely called people out. I am specifically thinking of Storm gloating about how China was “done with covid already.” I don’t know how many times I can put the same phrase in quotes.
GSC, your problem is you’re taking offense at something that doesn’t even necessarily involve you. You’re getting all defensive even though I never mentioned your name.
I don’t remember you ever mentioning China in this context, skeeter.
1 Like
The point is who fucking cares if you save a couple of people? When you are risking all these other health problems, financial problems, etc…That anyone with a brain can see, but ZeroCovid wack jobs think don’t matter. Leftists don’t care because their answer to everything is “well we should all have the same exact amount of money to begin with, and it’s ok for a HUGE amount of people to be government, stimulus- dependent, etc…” So in their world they solve the financial aspect of it.
The other point is…Everything in the world can be delivered to your house. You can lock your fucking self down if you want!! No one is stopping you.
Easy stuff here.
I was cool with lockdowns for a few months…After that we knew everything we needed to know.
It’s truly a cult with sanctimonious, fear-mongering assholes like djrion. You gotta be one sick motherfucker to want to go back to locking down over covid…No two ways around it.
Nope, it’s just risk vs. reward. That’s all it is.
Such a large population of covid deaths were people who would have been dead within 18 months (homes) that all efforts should have been concentrated there, and after a reasonable amount of time. Move forward. Everyone dies at some point last I checked. Unfortunate yes… But like everything in life has to be approached with reason and risk vs. reward.
All that needs to be said.
It made a lot of sense at the beginning until we got a handle on things. Not knowing what we’re up against, novel virus, potential bioweapon and all that.
I don’t think it’s unreasonable at all to debate what the perfect length of lockdown time was or if it dragged too long in some places or whatever.
Oh wow- what a deflection. This has nothing to do with “death panels” lol.
Again you purposely mischaracterize my statement to support your narrative. I never ever ever said “it was good” that anyone died. What an amazingly shifty thing to accuse your opponent of. It’s disgusting.
What I did absolutely say was - if we are going to have x amount of deaths - meaning - this many people minimum will die no matter what action we take- what should be the policy?
Does a state adopt a policy that leads to the death of its youngest and most potentially active citizens or does it adopt a policy that protects the youngest and most potentially active but sacrifices the oldest who have already lived their lives AND MOST LIKELY WOULD SACRIFICE THEIR LIVES FOR YOUNGER COUNTRYMEN.
If you asked me- I would willingly give my life at 80,90,100 years old to save 0,1,2,5 and 10 year olds.
I would happily do it. Especially if I have grandkids in that category.
For anyone to argue with this is a lie and insanity OR you are a disgusting person who values your life way too much. This is what a man does. Disagree if you like but to your detriment and exposure.
Is that the same risk v reward that same group applies considering abortion? You know…all lives matter and all
Wait, don’t you dispute all the Covid deaths in general? Now you have alleged statistics about a proportion of the population dying from it and nursing homes? If you dispute the Covid deaths, how exactly do you now have the notion a sizable portion would have been dead in 18 months?
You have any data to that or did your asshole forget to hit Print?