Oh, please. You’re not a Christian—you just cosplay as one while worshiping your own ignorance and cruelty. You ditched the whole “love thy neighbor” thing ages ago and replaced it with “hate whoever makes me uncomfortable.” Your religion isn’t Christianity; it’s just a flimsy excuse to be a colossal shitbag.
Saying “both parties are somewhat responsible but Republicans more so” suggests that Democrats had similar means to stop the con but failed. That’s misleading. The Republican Party actively enabled, defended, and protected the con man at every turn, while Democrats faced institutional barriers (e.g., the Senate, the Supreme Court, and GOP obstruction) that limited their ability to act.
The GOP didn’t just fail to take the con man seriously; they actively embraced him. They ran cover, refused to hold him accountable, and still do. They weren’t duped—they saw him as useful. Equating that with Democrats underestimating public gullibility is a major false equivalence.
One party impeached him—twice. One party tried to investigate. One party pushed back, albeit imperfectly. The other actively cheered him on, bent the rules for him, and is still trying to put him back in power. Trying to spread the blame dilutes the reality: this was a GOP-driven disaster.
Bahahaha
Truly special moment here
So asshead80 fakes being unbiased and EVEN THAT triggers warden…You have to be a biased, partisan sheep at all costs @elite80…never ever disrespect the cult, even if you are just playing double agent!!! Don’t ever forget it.
ENJOY
THE
MELTDOWN
One party impeached him—twice. One party tried to investigate.
All with the purist of intentions, and all entirely based on facts huh? Imagine being this selectively blind and stupid.
Warden, i just dont think they took him serious enough. Biden beat him and basically thought anyone else could. When they ran Harris and basically haded her the job after failing before was on the dems. They should have ran multiple people and let them do town halls and pick someone else after that.