You’ve got zero proof of election fraud, period. Zilch. Zero.
You keep losing elections, too. One would hope you’d grow a dick, put on big boy pants and own up, but you never will. You’re too weak as a person
Really? You’re just trying to get an opinion on the judge’s ruling, huh? You’re not making claims of fraud, itself, right?
“Answer the question.”
“What’s the statute?”
“Stay on target.”
“It’s not the law, it’s the judge’s decision.” Is shown the statute.
“Oh… in that case it’s a horrible law.”
Exactly. I don’t want anyone to grovel or beg forgiveness for making a mistake. A simple “my bad” or “I missed that” is enough.
But GSC ignores that part about him being wrong, pretends it never happened, and just reiterates his same conclusion a different way. In fact, he just made another thread talking smack about Katie Hobbs and election employees being prosecuted if they don’t do their jobs. it’s the exact same issue. The law is codified, in Arizona, yet he’s blaming current Democrats for it.
This is the part that GSC misses: When you’re wrong, you should re-evaluate your previous position. Instead he keeps banging away at it without learning a thing.
I gotta tell you…. Fucking jackals these ones. Incapable of just moving forward. This is why I always say trump is smart for never giving into the the left’s demands. They don’t reward you- they continue the assault.
I literally said “just did” to Djrion’s “read the article” comment.
And then I made a statement that the law is horrible.
That’s a complete change in my position right? Ergo it’s an admission that I was incorrect about the judge. She/he had to make that decision. Was compelled to.
Just because someone doesn’t literally say “I’m wrong” doesn’t mean they didn’t admit to getting something wrong.
I love how GSC vaguely admitted he was wrong here - while surrounding it with grievances about the topic and of other posters who clearly proved him wrong and were ready to move on a long time ago.