Arizona AG Candidate to sue

You are lying AGAIN

Down little guy. You’re going to wrinkle my pants.

Tough getting beat down daily lil bitch? Need a shoulder to cry on?

I’m getting beat down daily? Really? That’s interesting.

Do you pat yourself mistakenly in all your other areas of life like this?

Let me break it down for the logic impaired.

  1. If there is a new AG nominee and you say, “Maybe we finally have someone with balls,” that implies that the current AG does not posses said balls.

  2. If the current AG does not possess balls, that means 305 was correct about current AG’s “investigation” being a meaningless nothingburger.

2 easy steps. Let’s see if he wiggles out of those.

Wrong!!! And to lead with such a fucking statement about logic impaired. How embarrassing.

The AG lawsuit is a civil one. He’s not AG yet because he feels his election was tampered with. I’m simply saying that he seems to have some balls (and some legal know how being he ran for AG) and I’m actually comparing it to the other CIVIL SUITS that were either thrown out or did not proceed over the past 2 years. Statement had NOTHING TO DO with Brnovich. Lol.

See above. Why would I compare a civil suite against a Prosecutors investigation?

Now you would be correct to assume I have no faith in Brnovich but I’ve publicly disclosed this over and over. Storm has chastised me a bit over it. I think my assumptions have proven right but this has nothing to do with him.

You’re hopeless.

“Maybe we finally have someone with balls” means that you don’t currently. It’s that simple. You can do all the mental gymnastics you want, but that’s what that statement means.

On top of that, you’re admitting you have no faith in the current AG now, which was my entire point to begin with. That “open investigation” of his is going nowhere. Also my point. Seeing a trend here?

Amen

Pathological liar
Negative humility

Vile unhuman

So I’m hopeless, a liar, vile, and have no humility?

Because I’m clarifying what I actually meant?

@thre305ive - most of those litigants that filed suit in 2020 didn’t follow through all the way to the Supreme Court (either State or Federal). They didn’t demand a hearing or hold these, what I believe are, activist judges, accountable.

I believe this guy will. I think he’ll take it to the Arizona SCOTUS if he needs to.

That was my comment’s meaning. I don’t understand why that offends you.

And I certainly don’t understand why Chihuahua over here has to get ridiculously personal on every comment. Fucking clown.

GsCl :japanese_goblin: wn strikes again.

Listen to the weasel, weasel.

1 Like

You’re a fucking stooge and an embarassment to humanity.

GSCl :japanese_goblin: wn

I mean brutal. Just brutal.

Yeah……as a general rule, prosecutors will only try cases they believe they can win…because…you know…evidence.

I’ve been saying for almost 2 years Brnovich is a troll. I’m not sure what you think you uncovered -

Sho that to Storm. He’s the one that thought Brnovich’s investigation would result in something. Not me.

Same with Durham.

The State protects itself. The AG and the Federal Prosecutors work for their respective states.

There’s no reason me that holds them accountable.

Funny because the opposite of something is nothing, as in… nothingburger.

I’m so glad we can finally agree.

I’m not sure what you’re misunderstanding.

I do believe that Brnovich is a clown and that this other AG would be better. But my comment wasn’t about him vs Brnovich. It was about the civil case.

Context:

And then:

1 Like

Here come the judicial games lol.

Why would a court force a potentially fraudulent certification?

Imagine going to the court and saying this guy sent me a fraudulent wire transfer and the judge says “we have to put it through first in order to do anything about it”

Wow. Justice in this country is dead.

Hmmmm….odd that I’ve never seen a GWP article youve posted about a trump appointed judge throwing out a case……interesting.

GSCl :japanese_goblin: wn running and hiding already ?