Lol
Everything is a conspiracy against me derp derp derp
Nothing is as it seems
1 Like
Lol 
thereās the narrative.
How many people did he shoot 305? Why didnāt he realize it was āhotā or ācoldā (the framing word) after the first person was injured?
Does Baldwin have a responsibility to check the gun? Or is it all up to the armorer?
I just gave you one.
Before yesterday you didnāt know what an armorer was. Or what a hot or cold gun on a set was. But powerful is the media. So powerful that youāre a movie set ethics expert.
It only becomes a relevant detail when it will be used to defend Baldwin.
I am, and counterfactuals are valid.
1 Like
It astounds me that within 24 hours, we could know this. The narrative is hard at work.
The media protect their peopleā¦. And Baldwin has always been protected. Remember when they let him off after berating his daughter?
Lol
Nothing is a conspiracy against me derp derp derp.
I think everything in life happens randomly, without coordination or planning.
Hi - Iām Djrion, and Iām a simpleton.
Some questions for the media slurpers who believe everything printed:
How does one bullet kill one person and injure another? Did it pass through her? Did it ricochet? Where are the details?
Why was Baldwin aiming at a cinematographer and a director?
Did the scene call for the precise actions Baldwin took? Did he deviate? How?
Did Baldwin check the supposed ācoldā gun or did he just believe what he was told?
Why did the Union crew walk out? What was stage beef?
Does Baldwin as the Producer have ultimate responsibility on set for all actions?
You donāt get tired of lying and making shit up on the fly?
Why is everything you type based on a conspiracy theory that you make up?
E
V
E
R
Y
L
A
S
T
W
O
R
D
1 Like
Because 90% of the things that make it to national news are, indeed, conspiraciesā¦. Set in place for bigger ends.
Sheeeeeeepppp sheeeeeppppp sheeeeep sheeeeep
Possibly, sure.
Is that what he was doing? Or was the person he was āfiringā at in the line of sight?
Iām not saying this never happens, but I tend to think 90% is a stretch.
So the bullet was a hollow point? It passed through a human torso?
So 2 people, a cinematographer and a director, were standing in the line of sight during a gun scene in a movie.
Ok- I guess that makes sense in some parallel universe.
I though hollow points exploded on contact? Could be wrongā¦.
I honestly donāt know. But it sounds to me like youāre saying Baldwin (or someone else) had malice?
The expand on impact but Some are designed to fragment and if they exit, can act as shrapnel in the room.
I donāt know if he did or didnāt but it shouldnāt be ruled out, should it be?
Why, because heās a household name?
Not necessarily - I guess my question is - why would he risk everything he has? Seems unlikely.
Iām not saying he did. And I donāt know what would motivate him if he did indeed do this intentionally.
Iām just saying that there seems to be a media effort to excuse him and to give him āoutsā and itās ridiculous.
Well, I think the most likely scenario is that it is a horrible accidentā¦.
To you, what differentiates āthe narrativeā from āthe truthā?
Because they were both injured with the single live bullet.
There are two posts in this thread above explaining this, mine and bikkiās. Instead of reading details, youāre more interested in assigning blame without even knowing what happened.
So much for your narrativeā¦
Like I said, on movie sets I believe the ultimate responsibility lies with the armorer, but I could be mistaken. I know for a fact however that every actor and extra with a gun on a movie set doesnāt check their weapon. Now, should we force them to? A possible discussion point.
Sure, and it was uninformed and false.
Are you saying the position of armorer is a lie and the media invented it in the wake of Alex Baldwinās shooting? That the terms hot gun and cold gun are not movie set terms?
Or are you lambasting me for educating myself on specifics?
What exact point are you making here? Should I close my eyes, plug my ears, and say ānyah nyah nyahā? whatās wrong with learning details about what happened? With learning what standard procedure is?
i guarantee you, if thereās a court case, these kinds of FACTS would be entered into EVIDENCE.
Bro, you can know this immediately by checking the gunā¦
Dude, this has been reported and you can read for yourself.
The live round went clean through the DP and then into the clavicle of the director.
Just a complete assumption on my part, but Iām guessing the gun was pointed at the movie camera, which is likely where those two people stand.
We donāt know this. That said, there were probably a number of witnesses as this was a movie production. Asking how many witnesses there were and getting these details are fine questions, however.
He already answered this. The AD told him it was a cold gun. He fired it and asked afterwards why it was hot.
Hollow points donāt pass through. Hollow points break apart and stay inside the body. Regular bullets pass through.
I did seea story on BBC with armorers criticizing/perplexed by what happened. They said even if the shot if firing toward the camera, anybody there should be behind a protective screen. So yes, it would seem we need these details.
Apologize in advance to GSC for actually reading up on how things work once againā¦
