No, I was disputing GSC’s claim that the top google results were suppressing this story. 2 of the top 3 google results were about this.
HOW DOES THIS WORK WHEN YOU BASICALLY SAID WHAT CAME UP WAS ALL FACT CHECKING?
YOU LITERALLY JUST PROVED HIS POINT…
So all fact-checking but no original source stories. Lol.
He said fact checkers about past stories.
1 of 3 was about a past story, and in turn not quite as relevant, but, as I’m apparently having to say for a 3rd time in as many posts, 2 of the 3 stories were about the newest events.
What does that even mean? Why can’t a fact-check be an original source story?
Because it’s editorializing on the original story. It’s drawing a conclusion.
Google, if they were honest, would first return the original story. I’m a big boy. I can read and analyze.
While true, your “story” is just a transcript of what people said, without any confirmation, proof, or fact-checking.
I’d rather a journalism source do some legwork, cross check and cite multiple sources, and be honest about their editorializing than otherwise.
What I like most about this Georgia lie:
“Our law enforcement officers and secretary of state’s office spent literally thousands of hours examining ballots in Fulton County and other counties trying to track these kinds of claims down, and so far we’ve seen nothing give any merit to it,” Gabriel Sterling, the Republican chief operating officer and chief financial officer for the Georgia secretary of state’s office, said in [a recent interview]
The criminal defendant’s word. That’s what you’re relying on.
The office that, if this is indeed true, will face CRIMINAL charges for fraud.
You heard it here first, folks. No one can ever legitimately deny anything ever again, because their word (or the words of the rest of the team researching the claims) doesn’t mean anything anymore. Guilty until proven innocent!
YOU WOULD?
SO WHAT JOURNALIST DO YOU READ THAT DO THAT MODERATE JUNIOR?
WHAT IS THEIR TRACK RECORD SOURCING TRUE STORIES?
PLEASE WE ALL WANT TO KNOW…
THIS ISN’T ONE OF THEM RIGHT?
Lol…Not saying he’s guilty
Saying if he was guilty he certainly wouldn’t fucking tell you.
Pretty easy concept here boys.
I used to laugh reading Pravda and Izvestia while in Russia. I never thought I’d see the day when they have more credibility than the New York Times, Washington Post, and all the leftist “fact checkers” on social media platforms. Eat more chicken! Under Biden there’s no beef to beef about.
The whole world is out to get me and Trump.
You guys are so gullible it is hilarious. Not really sure how you wake up and look at yourself everyday knowing that you are both lying and convincing yourself at the same time that the lie is true.
Is this an answer to my statement?
Do you deny that the Secretary of States office would be at fault if they knew and allowed election fraud to occur?
It’s a pretty simple logical inference.
Yes.
No.
If you are gullible, obtuse, and have an acorn sized brain.
Wow- you just don’t have an answer. And that’s fine. But this response is just goofy.
Let me show you who is the goofy one, making up narratives, and continuing to spread lies:
“Raffensberger is a criminal defendant”
Your words. Not mine.
Yea- but that wasn’t what I said.
I said he and his office (those that report to him both from the state and county)… wait for it…
Are POTENTIAL criminal defendants.
POTENTIAL.
If there is fraud discovered that turned the election over to Biden, and it’s discovered that the SOS office or County Election officials knew or aided… what do you suppose would happen next?
Goofball.